Love By Any Other Name — Implicit Gay Romances in Gaming 1

This month is Romance Month! All of our arti­cles in April deal with romance or rela­tion­ships (or both!) in games.

Video game romances large­ly exist as func­tions of game mechan­ics — the romance exists to fur­ther the power esca­la­tion nar­ra­tive of the typ­i­cal­ly male, straight avatar, by sup­ply­ing anoth­er quest to com­plete, anoth­er vir­tu­al good to acquire, anoth­er sta­tis­tic on an invis­i­ble spread­sheet to max­i­mize. Unlike film and lit­er­a­ture, where romance exists as a dis­crete genre, main­stream gam­ing does not rec­og­nize such a genre, except­ing the world of visu­al nov­els which almost cer­tain­ly require sep­a­rate analy­sis. While romance as such is rare through­out the medi­um, there are even fewer main­stream games that fea­ture gay or les­bian romance. These romances gen­er­al­ly exist with­in the par­a­digm of romance-as-quest, not counter to it, and resist the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of their char­ac­ters as LGBT per se. Rather, these romances tend to be func­tion­al equiv­a­lents for their het­ero­sex­u­al coun­ter­parts. Thus it is that we have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to look at implic­it romances in games, a way of read­ing romance gen­er­al­ly and gay romance specif­i­cal­ly into exist­ing nar­ra­tives to tease out poten­tials with­in the game expe­ri­ence that may not exist oth­er­wise.

One such gam­ing expe­ri­ence is the PS2/Vita game Persona 4, a main­stream Japanese dungeon-crawling RPG which shares a sub­stan­tial amount of DNA with the roman­tic visu­al novel. Persona 4 does, in fact, fea­ture LGBT char­ac­ters, but its han­dling of them removes them from play as queer romance pos­si­bil­i­ties. The nar­ra­tive tries very hard to strip the LGBT char­ac­ters of their iden­ti­ties and rein­te­grate them back into the plot as “nor­mal”, per­form­ing for the remain­der of the story as heterosexual/cisgender indi­vid­u­als. This first occurs with Kanji, a soft-hearted artist who repress­es his same-sex attrac­tions by fronting as a tough guy and join­ing a gang. The Persona team frees him from the dun­geon of his neu­roses — a bath house, nat­u­ral­ly — and he decides that he is free to pur­sue his artis­tic, empath­ic side, but not free to pur­sue his homo­sex­u­al incli­na­tions. For the rest of the game he is repeat­ed­ly made fun of, pri­mar­i­ly by the protagonist’s best friend and con­fi­dant, Yosuke.

After free­ing Kanji from social ostra­ciza­tion at the expense of what seems to be an authen­tic homo­sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion, the game nar­ra­tive turns to Naoto, a trans­gen­der boy who wants to be a detec­tive. Similar threads are pur­sued — the team does not at first real­ize that Naoto is trans­gen­der and takes him to be cis­gen­der. Then, when Naoto is held cap­tive with­in his own dun­geon and threat­ened with gen­der reas­sign­ment surgery, he too “real­izes” that all he want­ed is to be a detec­tive and that he can go back to iden­ti­fy­ing as female. Once the thick-headed Persona team dis­cov­ers his “real” gen­der, Kanji is relieved, since he had been attract­ed to Naoto, and the knowl­edge that Naoto was born female absolves him of the inter­nal­ized homo­pho­bia expe­ri­enced while being attract­ed to anoth­er boy.

This is the way LGBT char­ac­ters are treat­ed in Persona 4, arguably one of the more pro­gres­sive of recent main­stream Japanese games. It seems that LGBT iden­ti­ties can be fetishized, but not fully real­ized — they can be erot­ic, but not roman­tic. Thus it is that if we are going to look for gay romance, we will have to look beyond the estab­lished nar­ra­tive itself. It is here that we come to Yosuke, who func­tions as an implic­it homo­sex­u­al romance path for the pro­tag­o­nist of Persona 4.

Yosuke is writ­ten as exclu­sive­ly straight, of course — to a fault. He express­es his het­ero­sex­u­al desires and self-identification loud­ly and more often than almost any­one, other than per­haps Kanji, who has a vest­ed inter­est in con­tin­u­ing to deny any sort of non-heterosexual desires. Of course, Yosuke takes it upon him­self to be the chief ques­tion­er of Kanji’s inten­tions, con­stant­ly con­cerned that Kanji is going to try to take advan­tage of him. While it is true that Yosuke might protest too much, this kind of vis­cer­al denial of homo­sex­u­al­i­ty should not be unfa­mil­iar to any­one famil­iar with anime and Japanese video games.

Regardless of the sur­face level expres­sion of Yosuke’s pro­cliv­i­ties, how­ev­er, there exists with­in the writ­ten nar­ra­tive a strong under­cur­rent of homo­eroti­cism. Yosuke devel­ops a deep attach­ment to Persona 4’s unnamed pro­tag­o­nist of the Frodo/Sam vari­ety — an unflag­ging loy­al­ty that rais­es eye­brows and sets fan­f­ic writ­ers to work. As part of the friend­ship build­ing mechan­ic — the “social link” — Yosuke will dis­cuss his feel­ings of loss about a girl he loved at length and seek to be com­fort­ed by the pro­tag­o­nist and not anoth­er girl, he will spend time in the protagonist’s bed­room, and he will get in a fist­fight with the pro­tag­o­nist to prove their friend­ship, after which they lay in the grass togeth­er and the social link is com­plet­ed. While ele­ments of homo­eroti­cism exist in other male social links, the rela­tion­ship between Yosuke and the pro­tag­o­nist holds the most poten­tial for a queer read­ing and sub­ver­sion of the game’s oth­er­wise pre­dom­i­nant­ly het­ero­sex­u­al per­spec­tive.

The Yosuke rela­tion­ship can fill this role of implic­it romance because Yosuke is not scru­ti­nized by the game’s nar­ra­tive. Where overt homo­pho­bia and homo­eroti­cism col­lide in sev­er­al of the other male char­ac­ters, Yosuke is seen as above sus­pi­cion. His story has the most poten­tial for actu­al homo­sex­u­al love indeed because no effort is made to cir­cum­scribe his iden­ti­ty. What’s most fas­ci­nat­ing about this rela­tion­ship, how­ev­er, is that it stands on its own regard­less of being made explic­it. Enough time is given to the rela­tion­ship that it has its own iden­ti­ty beyond the game­play mechan­ic of lev­el­ing up the protagonist’s “social link.” Similarly, at a broad­er level the whole romance/friendship game­play com­po­nent of Persona 4 stands on its own with­out the heavy dun­geon crawl­ing. We could look at Persona as a game in cri­sis — like Kanji, it doesn’t know which side it wants to play for, although it’s pret­ty clear to us as gamers and read­ers that a strong iden­ti­ty is emerg­ing.

Persona 4 is notable not just for its main­stream suc­cess but because it shows that a genre game can devel­op past its trap­pings and become some­thing that gamers can iden­ti­fy with on a level beyond the good vs. evil tropes of JRPGs. Rather, by lay­er­ing the expect­ed nar­ra­tive with  of romance and friend­ship, Persona allows gamers a deep­er per­son­al con­nec­tion with the char­ac­ters and a there­fore greater lat­i­tude in devel­op­ing idio­syn­crat­ic read­ings of the estab­lished nar­ra­tive. As games have devel­oped, a gram­mar of gam­ing nar­ra­tive has been grow­ing that allows for sub­text and rein­ter­pre­ta­tion beyond the bounds of game design. While ide­al­ly game writ­ing will con­tin­ue to mature and we will see more fully devel­oped gay romances (as well as just more romances and relationship-based games in gen­er­al), the fact that these kinds of implic­it con­nec­tions can be read into char­ac­ters is evi­dence itself of a more sophis­ti­cat­ed trend in game writ­ing and crit­i­cism that leaves enough room in nar­ra­tive struc­tures to allow for these kinds of inter­pre­ta­tions.

In the same way, Tomb Raider is a game that invites this kind of queer read­ing, although it plays on dif­fer­ent expec­ta­tions and is writ­ten pri­mar­i­ly for a Western audi­ence. In the game, Lara Croft and her crew are ship­wrecked, and while Lara and her best friend Sam sur­vive and are quick­ly reunit­ed, Sam is just as quick­ly kid­napped by the game’s vil­lain Mathias. Throughout the course of the game, Lara will mur­der an unspeak­able num­ber of island pirates and work her way to the castle/monastery where Sam is being kept and res­cue her from a rit­u­al to res­ur­rect an ancient queen at the hands of the insane Mathias. At a top level view, the plot con­forms to a typ­i­cal com­bat power fan­ta­sy struc­ture in which the play­er expe­ri­ences first a sense of achieve­ment through win­ning com­bat, and later a greater sense of achieve­ment by res­cu­ing the damsel in dis­tress, but the inter­est­ing spin on this damsel­ing cliché is that both char­ac­ters are female. Given that this well-used video game trope tra­di­tion­al­ly occurs between char­ac­ters who are either relat­ed (which Sam and Lara are not) or roman­ti­cal­ly involved, it once again leaves the rela­tion­ship open to being read as inti­mate, though it is not writ­ten as such. Tomb Raider’s lead writer, Rhianna Pratchett, has denied that this impli­ca­tion was inten­tion­al, and that she didn’t want to write a “male char­ac­ter with boobs”, But while Pratchett cer­tain­ly had great suc­cess work­ing with­in the con­straints of AAA game devel­op­ment in craft­ing the most nuanced Lara Croft to date, the fact remains that Lara as a char­ac­ter and avatar remains a woman per­form­ing a tra­di­tion­al­ly male role in a nar­ra­tive struc­ture that con­forms to male-dominant stereo­types.

The expect­ed audi­ence for Tomb Raider may actu­al­ly be quite wel­com­ing of a gay Lara, if only because les­bian romances seem to be more accept­able with­in young straight male gamer com­mu­ni­ties than gay male rela­tion­ships (see: Mass Effect 1). However, this places a writer desir­ing to focus on a les­bian rela­tion­ship in some­thing of a double-bind, where an authen­tic romance could be seen as too fringe or unwant­ed in the male-performative space of video games, but on the other hand could be seen as tit­il­lat­ing or fan-service for the core audi­ence of young males, and thus debas­ing to the integri­ty of the nar­ra­tive.

Once again, we see a game in cri­sis. Tomb Raider excels when it func­tions out­side of its expect­ed role as male com­bat fan­ta­sy and when the nar­ra­tive tropes and stereo­types it does cater to are sub­vert­ed. The first hour of Tomb Raider is at moments uncom­fort­able (such as when the vio­lence against Lara verges on voyeuris­tic) but as a unit is stronger than much of what fol­lows. It is the seg­ment of the game most divorced from the core game­play mechan­ic of man-killing and is all the stronger for it. Lara hunts, sur­vives, explores, and gen­er­ates gen­uine empa­thy for her­self and her crew­mates. It is these moments that remain strongest through­out the game — the inter­ac­tions with Lara’s friends, the explo­ration of the hand­ful of option­al tombs, the build­ing up of a female hero that doesn’t need to con­form to expec­ta­tions of male per­for­mance. Unfortunately this expe­ri­ences com­prise the minor­i­ty of game time, but that they do exist is won­der­ful and gives the expe­ri­ence of Tomb Raider some­thing spe­cial amidst other AAA action-adventure titles.

Where Tomb Raider dif­fers from Persona is in the devel­op­ment of the implic­it romance itself. Due to Sam’s damsel­ing there is very lit­tle on-screen inter­ac­tion between Sam and Lara — the rela­tion­ship is sup­pressed on behalf of the demands of the nar­ra­tive. Because of this, it did not even occur to me to think of Sam and Lara as lovers until after I had com­plet­ed the game. Tomb Raider’s empha­sis on the ten­sion of com­bat and its ruth­less era­sure of Lara Croft’s human needs beyond basic power strug­gle and sur­vival is so com­plete as to make Lara as roman­tic being utter­ly invis­i­ble. Yet this void demands to be filled, and like Yosuke, a nar­ra­tive refusal to com­ment is itself a com­ment. Because Lara fills and indeed exceeds the lim­i­ta­tions of the power fan­ta­sy so well, the ques­tion of her need for inti­ma­cy rises to the sur­face. The ques­tion must inevitably be read through the trans­for­ma­tive expe­ri­ence of her sur­vival, an expe­ri­ence in which Sam was her most sig­nif­i­cant part­ner and con­cern, often over­rid­ing Lara’s con­cern for her own safe­ty. Looking back at Tomb Raider in this way, it becomes dif­fi­cult to read the Sam and Lara rela­tion­ship in any other way — they are char­ac­ters on the cusp of being com­plete, and the com­plete­ness must cer­tain­ly be found in each other.

Ironically, the rea­son these read­ings of Tomb Raider and Persona can func­tion is because of their silence on or out­right rejec­tion of gay iden­ti­ties. Lara Croft is a sex­u­al­ized char­ac­ter (albeit less so than her pre­vi­ous incar­na­tions), but is not allowed to be a sex­u­al char­ac­ter. In the absence of any dis­cus­sion of gay love, and a non-identification with poten­tial het­ero­sex­u­al romance, the silence becomes preg­nant with mean­ing. The same goes for Yosuke — because he exists in a world where gay iden­ti­ties are reject­ed and clos­et­ed, the fact that he is never under sus­pi­cion means that he is the only one with the agency to cross the bound­ary into romance.

Gaming cur­rent­ly exists in a state such that LGBT iden­ti­ties are pref­er­en­tial­ly ignored rather than dis­cussed, much like roman­tic rela­tion­ships them­selves. Most roman­tic rela­tion­ships in games exist with­in the power fan­ta­sy struc­ture of tra­di­tion­al game nar­ra­tive — if not as male power fan­ta­sy, as male-performative power fan­ta­sy. The “romance” exists as a tro­phy for the char­ac­ter, achieved in sur­mount­ing a series of gam­i­fied obsta­cles and cul­mi­nat­ing in the acqui­si­tion of the (typ­i­cal­ly het­ero­sex­u­al female) object of desire. Gay romance can func­tion sim­i­lar­ly when actu­al­ly present in video games, but in this space where gay iden­ti­ties are silenced and thus romance can be read into the nar­ra­tive, the romance sub­verts power fan­ta­sy itself in favor of a more authen­ti­cal­ly emo­tion­al expe­ri­ence.

This is how implic­it romances truly func­tion — they give a voice to play­er inter­ests that exist apart from gam­i­fi­ca­tion and the reduc­tion of romance to sta­tis­tic tables — they open up games to the pos­si­bil­i­ty of authen­tic female char­ac­ters that are not male-performative, and to male char­ac­ters that are not hetero-performative. In this way the total gam­ing expe­ri­ence is enriched. The act of  LGBT indi­vid­u­als play­ing tra­di­tion­al games becomes a cri­tique of gaming’s most trea­sured sta­tus quo, the tar­get gamer iden­ti­fied as a young het­ero­sex­u­al male. While we know that gam­ing now com­pris­es many other demo­graph­ics, and devel­op­ers are begin­ning to address those demo­graph­ics, the money and pub­lic­i­ty still lies in this mar­ket. By play­ing these main­stream romances through the eyes of silenced female, gay and trans* char­ac­ters, the cri­tique gives an oppor­tu­ni­ty to not only bet­ter rep­re­sent these groups with­in gam­ing, but to uti­lize these per­spec­tives to improve tra­di­tion­al game nar­ra­tive as well. In this way the char­ac­ter­i­za­tion and func­tion of game rela­tion­ships in gen­er­al, and romances in par­tic­u­lar, will be enriched, and by being enriched will become increas­ing­ly viable as a more promi­nent com­po­nent to future game design.

Lex Tyler

About Lex Tyler

Lex Tyler is a freelance game critic, data junkie, and erstwhile Classicist. He spends his time contemplating the perfection of shag carpet and wondering which character in Love Actually he is most like.

One thought on “Love By Any Other Name — Implicit Gay Romances in Gaming

Comments are closed.